It is established that
genome, nucleus and red blood cell size are all correlated in
vertebrates. Since larger cells have lower surface area to volume
ratios, they are less efficient at gas exchange; which means that
high metabolisms are constrained to small cells, which must therefore
have small genomes. Powered flight is metabolically expensive, so
birds are predicted to have smaller average genomes compared to all
other vertebrates. Saurischian dinosaurs underwent a genome reduction
before they evolved powered flight and gave rise to birds; within
birds genome size tends to be smaller with increasing flying ability.
This study compares 37
species of hummingbirds in terms of nucleus, red blood cell and
genome size, as well as other physiological parameters such as
cardiac mass, haemoglobin concentration, body mass, wing loading and
elevation, taking phylogeny into account. Genome size of hummingbirds
was found to be constrained similarly to other vertebrates. Genome
size across hummingbird species was found to have low variation and
did not correlate with body size, but was positively correlated with
heart size. The results generated two important questions which could
be extrapolated to other groups; 1) is genome size a derived or
ancestral feature? and 2) why do some species within a clade have
larger genomes?
Hummingbirds diverged
from nightjars; a group which have larger genome sizes than
hummingbirds, so genome reduction must have occurred after this
divergence and is therefore not an ancestral feature. Hummingbird
species with the largest genomes were all from the upper tropical
zone in 900-1600 m humid evergreen forests; these species are not
close relatives, so the secondary change in genome size (the primary
change being the reduction following divergence from nightjars) makes
the relationship between phylogeny and genome size not as clear as
the relationship between environment and genome size. Thus this study
provides a strong example of evolution influenced by interactions
between the genome and the environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment